CarteaCompare CarsGLA 250 4MATIC vs G9 RWD Standard Range

GLA 250 4MATIC vs G9 RWD Standard Range Comparison

Car Information

/

6.6

/

460 kM

/

78.2 kWh

Engine / Motor

/

200

Dimensions

5

5

1,600

2235

4,410

4891

1,834

1937

1,611

1680

2,729

2998

/

19

/

5

/

660/1576 Front Trunk 71L

Fuel Economy

6.6 L/100 km

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Electric

Interior

/

/

/

Front & Back Row Seats

/

10.25

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Digital

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

7

/

/

/

Front And Rear

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

14.96

/

14.96

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

8

Battery/Charging

/

CCS2

/

20min = 10-80% SOC

/

up to 260

/

≥9h

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Rear Drive

/

Double Wishbone Independent Suspension

/

Multi-link Independent Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated Braking Discs

/

Ventilated Braking Discs

/

255/55R19

/

255/55R19

Key Spec

1.3 L - 2.0 L

/

163 BHP - 224 hp

310 BHP

7-speed automatic (7G-DCT) & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

5

/

TBD

/

460

Engine

2.0 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

224 hp

310 BHP

165

/

350 Nm

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

430

/

1

/

LFP

/

Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor

/

230

/

310

Technologies

/

/

5

/

12

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GLA 250 4MATIC

    • 360 Degree Camera
  • G9 RWD Standard Range

    • Power Tailgate
    • Welcome Light
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Heater
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Front Cross Traffic Alert
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickG9 RWD Standard Range

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GLA 250 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment; choose G9 RWD Standard Range if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | GLA 250 4MATIC

VS

Jeep | Grand Cherokee L 3.6L Limited+

Mercedes Benz | GLA 250 4MATIC

VS

Audi | Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design

Mercedes Benz | GLA 250 4MATIC

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2020 4.0L GXR GT

Mercedes Benz | GLA 250 4MATIC

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2019 4.0L GXR GT

Mercedes Benz | GLA 250 4MATIC

VS

Mercedes Benz | GLA 250 4MATIC

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GLA 250 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 15.15, while G9 RWD Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GLA 250 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,729, while G9 RWD Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2998. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G9 RWD Standard Range, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLA 250 4MATIC uses No data, while G9 RWD Standard Range uses Rear Drive.