GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
210 km/h
4
6
1998 cc
3490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4634 mm
5115 mm
2020 mm
1980 mm
1658 mm
1920 mm
2829 mm
2890 mm
535 L
1004 L
135 m
221 m
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
60 L
110 L
11 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
3.3 L - 5.7 L
306 BHP
240 BHP - 409
8-speed dual-clutch AT
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 7 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
306 BHP
271 BHP
400 Nm
385 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L
Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L if you care more about fuel economy; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2829 mm, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L uses All Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.