CarteaCompare CarsGLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L vs Nissan Patrol LE Titanium 3.5L

GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L vs Nissan Patrol LE Titanium 3.5L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

260 km/h

240 km/h

4

6

1998 cc

3492 cc

GCC

Japanese

Dimensions

7 Seater

8 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4634 mm

5350 mm

2020 mm

2030 mm

1658 mm

1955 mm

2829 mm

3075 mm

535 L

836 L

135 m

253 m

Fuel Economy

11 Km/L

/

60 L

97 L

11 Km/L

7.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

14.3

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

12

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L

3.5 L - 425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)

306 BHP

275 BHP - 495 BHP

8-speed dual-clutch AT

9 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 9-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 7 Seater

7 - 8 Seater

Engine

In-Line

V

2.0 L

3.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

Twin Turbo

4

4

306 BHP

425 BHP

400 Nm

700 Nm

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L

    • Nissan Patrol LE Titanium 3.5L

      • Power Tailgate
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • Outstanding off-road performance
    • Outstanding engine power
    • Spacious and luxurious interior design

    Negative

    • High fuel consumption
    • High purchase and maintenance costs
    • Slow electronic system response

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickGLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L if you care more about price; choose Nissan Patrol LE Titanium 3.5L if you care more about interior space.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Mercedes Benz | GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L

    VS

    Audi | Q7 45 TFSI quattro S Line 2.0L

    Mercedes Benz | GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L

    VS

    Nissan | Nissan Patrol LE Titanium 3.5L

    Mercedes Benz | GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L

    VS

    Audi | Audi SQ5 2024 3.0 TFSI

    Mercedes Benz | GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L

    VS

    Audi | Audi Q7 2024 40 TFSI Design quattro (252 HP)

    Mercedes Benz | GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L

    VS

    Lincoln | Aviator 3.0T V6 Presidential

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while Nissan Patrol LE Titanium 3.5L has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2829 mm, while Nissan Patrol LE Titanium 3.5L has a wheelbase of 3075 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nissan Patrol LE Titanium 3.5L, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLB 35 AMG 4MATIC 2.0L uses All Wheel Drive, while Nissan Patrol LE Titanium 3.5L uses Four Wheel Drive .