GLC 250 4Matic vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4656
4490 mm
1890
1874 mm
1639
1613 mm
2873
2750 mm
550
/
Fuel Economy
/
/
66
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
/
211 BHP - 255
153 BHP - 305 BHP
9-speed automatic & Automatic
TBD
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Engine
/
/
Gasoline
Electric
/
305 BHP
350
680 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLC 250 4Matic
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLC 250 4Matic if you care more about interior space; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLC 250 4Matic has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLC 250 4Matic has a wheelbase of 2873, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLC 250 4Matic, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLC 250 4Matic uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.