GLC 300 vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
/
5 Seater
/
4440 mm
/
1833 mm
/
1560 mm
/
2700 mm
/
330 L
Fuel Economy
/
13.5 Km/L
/
60 L
/
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.8 L
211 BHP - 255
130 BHP - 133 BHP
9-speed automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.8 L
/
Gasoline
/
130 BHP
/
170 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLC 300
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS Sport 1.8L Classic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLC 300 if you care more about power; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLC 300 has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLC 300 has a wheelbase of No data, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLC 300 uses No data, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.