GLC 300 4MATIC vs GLC 300 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
6.2
/
Engine / Motor
240
/
Dimensions
5
/
4,716
/
1,890
/
1,648
/
2,888
/
Fuel Economy
13.7
/
66
/
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
Burmester®
/
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
/
211 BHP - 255
/
9-speed automatic & Automatic
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5
/
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
/
255
/
190
/
400
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLC 300 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
GLC 300 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGLC 300 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLC 300 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment; choose GLC 300 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLC 300 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 7.3, while GLC 300 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 7.3. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLC 300 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,888, while GLC 300 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,888. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLC 300 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while GLC 300 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive.