GR86 MT 2.4L vs GR86 MT 2.4L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
4
/
18
/
4265
/
1775
/
1310
/
Fuel Economy
12.2
/
50
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.
/
Safety
Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
6-speed Manual Transmission
/
Wheels/brakes
215/40 R18
/
215/40 R18
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 2.4 L
/
228 BHP - 228 BHP
/
6-speed Automatic Transmission & 6-speed Manual Transmission
/
Petrol & Gasoline
/
TBD
/
4 Seater - 4 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.4L
/
Gasoline
/
228
/
250
/
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
GR86 MT 2.4L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
GR86 MT 2.4L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGR86 MT 2.4L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GR86 MT 2.4L if you care more about overall equipment; choose GR86 MT 2.4L if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GR86 MT 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 8.2, while GR86 MT 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GR86 MT 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data, while GR86 MT 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GR86 MT 2.4L uses No data, while GR86 MT 2.4L uses No data.