GR86 MT 2.4L vs GR86 A/T 2.4L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
Dimensions
4
4 Seater
18
18
4265
4265 mm
1775
1775 mm
1310
1310 mm
Fuel Economy
12.2
13.4
50
50 L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
Front Row Seats
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Dual
Dual
Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.
Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.
/
Leather
/
Digital
Safety
Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.
Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
6
Transmission
6-speed Manual Transmission
6-speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/40 R18
215/40 R18
215/40 R18
215/40 R18
Key Spec
2.4 L - 228.0 L
2.4 L - 228.0 L
228 BHP - 233 BHP
228 BHP - 233 BHP
6-speed Automatic Transmission & 6-speed Manual Transmission & Automatic Transmission & Manual
6-speed Automatic Transmission & 6-speed Manual Transmission & Automatic Transmission & Manual
Petrol & Gasoline
Petrol & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 4 Seater
4 Seater - 4 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
Engine
2.4L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Petrol
228
228 BHP
250
250 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GR86 MT 2.4L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
GR86 A/T 2.4L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GR86 MT 2.4L if you care more about overall equipment; choose GR86 A/T 2.4L if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GR86 MT 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 8.2, while GR86 A/T 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 7.46. Therefore, GR86 A/T 2.4L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GR86 MT 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data, while GR86 A/T 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GR86 MT 2.4L uses No data, while GR86 A/T 2.4L uses Rear Wheel Drive .