Grand Cherokee 4xe vs 5 2WD Standard Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4906
4710 mm
1979
1930 mm
1812
1620 mm
2964
2875 mm
/
5 Doors
/
367 L
Fuel Economy
10.7
/
72
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/50 R20
/
265/50 R20
/
Key Spec
2.0
/
268 BHP
220 BHP - 530 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Hybrid
Electric
TBD
/
5
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
483 km - 500 km
Engine
2.0
/
Hybrid
Electric
268 BHP
295 BHP
/
420 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Grand Cherokee 4xe
5 2WD Standard
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent fuel efficiency thanks to the hybrid system
- Modern technologies and luxurious features inside the cabin
- High off-road capabilities
Negative
- The high price of the car compared to competitors
- Relatively short electric driving range
- The weight of the car is heavy compared to non-hybrid models
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGrand Cherokee 4xe
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Grand Cherokee 4xe if you care more about price; choose 5 2WD Standard if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Grand Cherokee 4xe has a fuel consumption of 9.35, while 5 2WD Standard has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Grand Cherokee 4xe has a wheelbase of 2964, while 5 2WD Standard has a wheelbase of 2875 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Cherokee 4xe, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Grand Cherokee 4xe uses No data, while 5 2WD Standard uses Rear Wheel Drive.