Grand Cherokee 4xe vs H2 1.5T Intelligent Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4906
4335 mm
1979
1814 mm
1812
1695 mm
2964
2560 mm
/
500 L
Fuel Economy
10.7
12.2 Km/L
72
55 L
/
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/50 R20
/
265/50 R20
/
Key Spec
2.0
1.5 L
268 BHP
147 BHP - 150 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Engine
2.0
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
268 BHP
148 BHP
/
210 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Grand Cherokee 4xe
H2 1.5T Intelligent
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent fuel efficiency thanks to the hybrid system
- Modern technologies and luxurious features inside the cabin
- High off-road capabilities
Negative
- The high price of the car compared to competitors
- Relatively short electric driving range
- The weight of the car is heavy compared to non-hybrid models
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH2 1.5T Intelligent
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Grand Cherokee 4xe if you care more about interior space; choose H2 1.5T Intelligent if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Grand Cherokee 4xe has a fuel consumption of 9.35, while H2 1.5T Intelligent has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, H2 1.5T Intelligent is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Grand Cherokee 4xe has a wheelbase of 2964, while H2 1.5T Intelligent has a wheelbase of 2560 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Cherokee 4xe, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Grand Cherokee 4xe uses No data, while H2 1.5T Intelligent uses Front Wheel Drive.