Grandland X 1.6T Innovation + vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
201 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4477 mm
4771 mm
1856 mm
1870 mm
1609 mm
1828 mm
2675 mm
2790 mm
514 L
/
Fuel Economy
14.3 Km/L
10 Km/L
53 L
/
14.3 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L
2.0 L
163 BHP
215 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
163 BHP
215 BHP
240 Nm
280 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Grandland X 1.6T Innovation +
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAlreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Grandland X 1.6T Innovation + if you care more about fuel economy; choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Grandland X 1.6T Innovation + has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Grandland X 1.6T Innovation + is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Grandland X 1.6T Innovation + has a wheelbase of 2675 mm, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Grandland X 1.6T Innovation + uses Front Wheel Drive, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.