CarteaCompare CarsGreat Wall Poer 2023 2.0T Top (4WD) vs Ford Ranger 2018 2.5L Double Cab (Base) 4X2 M/T

Great Wall Poer 2023 2.0T Top (4WD) vs Ford Ranger 2018 2.5L Double Cab (Base) 4X2 M/T Comparison

Car Information

/

12.0

/

Engine / Motor

4

4

/

170

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5.410

5.171

1.934

1.811

1.886

1.719

3.230

3.197

/

1180

Fuel Economy

80

80

/

10.2

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Manual

Chassis & Steering

/

/

All Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Lighting configuration

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L - 3.2 L

188 - 188

118 BHP - 392 BHP

8AT & AT8 & Automatic

10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual

Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

3 Seater - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.5 L

Petrol

Petrol

188 BHP

164 BHP

360

226

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Great Wall Poer 2023 2.0T Top (4WD)

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Ford Ranger 2018 2.5L Double Cab (Base) 4X2 M/T

    • Seats - Comfort
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickFord Ranger 2018 2.5L Double Cab (Base) 4X2 M/T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Great Wall Poer 2023 2.0T Top (4WD) if you care more about interior space; choose Ford Ranger 2018 2.5L Double Cab (Base) 4X2 M/T if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Great Wall | Great Wall Poer 2023 2.0T Top (4WD)

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot Landtrek 2022 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T)

Great Wall | Great Wall Poer 2023 2.0T Top (4WD)

VS

Great Wall | Great Wall Poer 2023 2.0T Top (4WD)

Great Wall | Great Wall Poer 2023 2.0T Top (4WD)

VS

Nissan | Nissan Navara 2019 ASF 4x4 M/T

Great Wall | Great Wall Poer 2023 2.0T Top (4WD)

VS

Ford | Ford Ranger 2018 2.5L Double Cab (Base) 4X2 M/T

Great Wall | Great Wall Poer 2023 2.0T Top (4WD)

VS

Peugeot | Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (A/T)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Great Wall Poer 2023 2.0T Top (4WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Ford Ranger 2018 2.5L Double Cab (Base) 4X2 M/T has a fuel consumption of 9.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Great Wall Poer 2023 2.0T Top (4WD) has a wheelbase of 3.230, while Ford Ranger 2018 2.5L Double Cab (Base) 4X2 M/T has a wheelbase of 3.197. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Great Wall Poer 2023 2.0T Top (4WD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Great Wall Poer 2023 2.0T Top (4WD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Ford Ranger 2018 2.5L Double Cab (Base) 4X2 M/T uses Rear Wheel Drive.