GS3 EMZOOM GB vs GS3 1.3T GB Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1370±41
/
4410±44
4350 mm
1850±18
1825 mm
1600±16
1680 mm
2650±26
2560 mm
145
/
/
370 L
Fuel Economy
/
13.3 Km/L
47
50 L
/
13.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Electronic Parking
/
225/55 R18
/
225/55 R18
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
172 BHP - 202 BHP
172 BHP - 202 BHP
7DCT & Automatic & DCT
7DCT & Automatic & DCT
Petrol & Gasoline
Petrol & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
4A15J2
/
174
202 BHP
130
/
5500
/
270
137 Nm
1400~4500
/
92
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
GS3 EMZOOM GB
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Power Tailgate
- Electric Locks
- Seats - Comfort
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
GS3 1.3T GB
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GS3 EMZOOM GB if you care more about price; choose GS3 1.3T GB if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GS3 EMZOOM GB has a fuel consumption of 6.18, while GS3 1.3T GB has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, GS3 EMZOOM GB is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GS3 EMZOOM GB has a wheelbase of 2650±26, while GS3 1.3T GB has a wheelbase of 2560 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS3 EMZOOM GB, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GS3 EMZOOM GB uses Front Drive, while GS3 1.3T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.