GX3 PRO GF vs Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
193
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4005
4.355
1575
1.810
1760
1.625
2480
2.670
250
358
/
✓
Fuel Economy
/
12.5
/
63
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
2
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
3.5
/
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
205/60 R16
/
205/60 R16
/
Key Spec
1.5
2.0 L - 2.0 L
100 BHP - 102
150 - 150
CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
100 BHP
150 BHP
/
197
Technologies
Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GX3 PRO GF
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Rear Camera
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Number of Airbags
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD)
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive and striking exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Reliable and consistent performance
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- The infotainment system is outdated
- Limited engine choices
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGX3 PRO GF
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GX3 PRO GF if you care more about price; choose Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GX3 PRO GF has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GX3 PRO GF has a wheelbase of 2480, while Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2.670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GX3 PRO GF, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GX3 PRO GF uses Front Drive, while Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.