GX3 PRO GK vs DFSK Fengon 500 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180
Dimensions
5
5
4005
/
1575
/
1760
/
2480
/
250
/
/
17"
Fuel Economy
/
13.9
/
50
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Interior
Front
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
/
Infotainment
3.5
/
2
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
205/60 R16
/
205/60 R16
/
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5
1.5T
100 BHP - 102
156
CVT
AT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.5T
Gasoline
Gasoline
100 BHP
156
/
220
Technologies
Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GX3 PRO GK
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Number of Airbags
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
DFSK Fengon 500
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGX3 PRO GK
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GX3 PRO GK if you care more about price; choose DFSK Fengon 500 if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GX3 PRO GK has a fuel consumption of No data, while DFSK Fengon 500 has a fuel consumption of 7.19. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GX3 PRO GK has a wheelbase of 2480, while DFSK Fengon 500 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GX3 PRO GK uses Front Drive, while DFSK Fengon 500 uses Front Drive.