GX3 PRO GK vs MG ZS 2019 1.5L COM Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4005
4.314
1575
1.809
1760
1.624
2480
2.585
250
448
/
✓
Fuel Economy
/
17.2
/
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
2
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
3.5
✓
2
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
205/60 R16
/
205/60 R16
/
Key Spec
1.5
1.3 L - 1.5 L
100 BHP - 102
112 BHP - 168
CVT
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
100 BHP
112 BHP
/
150
Technologies
Rear
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GX3 PRO GK
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Number of Airbags
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
MG ZS 2019 1.5L COM
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGX3 PRO GK
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GX3 PRO GK if you care more about price; choose MG ZS 2019 1.5L COM if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GX3 PRO GK has a fuel consumption of No data, while MG ZS 2019 1.5L COM has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GX3 PRO GK has a wheelbase of 2480, while MG ZS 2019 1.5L COM has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GX3 PRO GK, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GX3 PRO GK uses Front Drive, while MG ZS 2019 1.5L COM uses Front Wheel Drive.