Haval V7 Medium vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

Hybrid

/

4800 x 1950 x 1843

/

Engine / Motor

/

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4800

4760 mm

1950

1930 mm

1843

1927 mm

/

5 Doors

/

2750 mm

/

400 L

/

224 m

Fuel Economy

12.3

10 Km/L

/

75 L

/

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

12.3"

/

Front Row Seats

Premium-textured VIP seats

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

15.6-inch color multi-touch screen

12.3

8 speaker : 4 tweeters + 4 woofers

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0T

2.0 L

227

223 BHP - 342 BHP

AT

Automatic

Hybrid

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0T

2.0 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

227

224 BHP

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

/

387 Nm

Motor

170

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

9 Modes

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Haval V7 Medium

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Cool Box
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Child Safety Monitoring System
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
  • 300 Challenger 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHaval V7 Medium

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Haval V7 Medium if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Haval | Haval V7 Medium

VS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

Haval | Haval V7 Medium

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV)

Haval | Haval V7 Medium

VS

Opel | Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

Haval | Haval V7 Medium

VS

Geely | Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS

Haval | Haval V7 Medium

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Haval V7 Medium has a fuel consumption of 8.13, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Haval V7 Medium is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Haval V7 Medium has a wheelbase of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Haval V7 Medium uses No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.