Haval V7 Medium vs Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
205 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4800
4855 mm
1950
1860 mm
1843
1465 mm
/
2805 mm
/
450 L
Fuel Economy
12.3
11.8 Km/L
/
70 L
/
11.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3"
/
Front Row Seats
/
Premium-textured VIP seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✔
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6-inch color multi-touch screen
/
8 speaker : 4 tweeters + 4 woofers
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0T
2.0 L - 2.5 L
227
157 BHP - 265 BHP
AT
AT & Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0T
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
227
240 BHP
/
350 Nm
Motor
170
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
9 Modes
/
✓
/
/
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Haval V7 Medium
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickOptima 2.0L T-GDI GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Haval V7 Medium if you care more about fuel economy; choose Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Haval V7 Medium has a fuel consumption of 8.13, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, Haval V7 Medium is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Haval V7 Medium has a wheelbase of No data, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT has a wheelbase of 2805 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Haval V7 Medium uses No data, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT uses Front Wheel Drive.