CarteaCompare CarsHiace Van STD DSL MT vs DFSK C35 Standard

Hiace Van STD DSL MT vs DFSK C35 Standard Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

/

/

140

/

1499

Dimensions

3

2

2210

/

16

14"

5265

4500

1950

1680

1990

1985

3210

3050

3300

/

5.5m

/

2530 - 1760 - 1340

/

6.2m³

/

1090

800

Fuel Economy

13.0 Km/L

15.5

70

55L

Comfort

/

/

Interior

4.2

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

/

/

2

/

Transmission

6-Speed Manual Transmission

5MT

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Drive

Macpherson Strut

Macpherson independent suspension

Leaf spring rigid

MacPherson 5 Leaf Springs Non-Independent Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Drum

Drum

215/70R16C

185/80R14

215/70R16C

185/80R14

/

Disc

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

1.5

88 BHP - 277

114

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

5MT

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

3 - 13 Seater

2

Exterior

/

/

/

Engine

2.8

1.5

Diesel

Gasoline

174

114

420

148

/

Naturally Aspirated

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Hiace Van STD DSL MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • Remote Central Door Locking
  • DFSK C35 Standard

    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDFSK C35 Standard

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Hiace Van STD DSL MT if you care more about interior space; choose DFSK C35 Standard if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2019 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater)

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2020 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater)

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GL High Roof LWB

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Nissan | Microbus H/R EX 2.5 AT 13S 4-Door

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot Traveller 2019 L3 VIP

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Hiace Van STD DSL MT has a fuel consumption of 7.69, while DFSK C35 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.45. Therefore, DFSK C35 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Hiace Van STD DSL MT has a wheelbase of 3210, while DFSK C35 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hiace Van STD DSL MT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Hiace Van STD DSL MT uses Rear Drive, while DFSK C35 Standard uses Rear Drive.