CarteaCompare CarsHiace Van STD DSL MT vs Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GL High Roof LWB

Hiace Van STD DSL MT vs Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GL High Roof LWB Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

4

/

160

Dimensions

3

13 Seater

2210

/

16

/

5265

5380

1950

1880

1990

2285

3210

3110

3300

/

5.5m

/

2530 - 1760 - 1340

/

6.2m³

/

1090

/

/

9800

Fuel Economy

13.0 Km/L

9.5

70

70

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

4.2

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

/

2

/

/

/

/

Transmission

6-Speed Manual Transmission

Manual

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Macpherson Strut

/

Leaf spring rigid

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Drum

/

215/70R16C

/

215/70R16C

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

2.5 L - 3.5 L

88 BHP - 277

88 BHP - 277

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

3 - 13 Seater

3 - 13 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.8

2.7 L

Diesel

Gasoline

174

149 BHP

420

240

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Hiace Van STD DSL MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • Remote Central Door Locking
  • Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GL High Roof LWB

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Temperature Display
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickToyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GL High Roof LWB

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Hiace Van STD DSL MT if you care more about fuel economy; choose Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GL High Roof LWB if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2019 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater)

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2020 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater)

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GL High Roof LWB

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Nissan | Microbus H/R EX 2.5 AT 13S 4-Door

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL MT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot Traveller 2019 L3 VIP

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Hiace Van STD DSL MT has a fuel consumption of 7.69, while Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GL High Roof LWB has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, Hiace Van STD DSL MT is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Hiace Van STD DSL MT has a wheelbase of 3210, while Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GL High Roof LWB has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hiace Van STD DSL MT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Hiace Van STD DSL MT uses Rear Drive, while Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GL High Roof LWB uses Rear Wheel Drive.