HR-V SPORT vs Tank 300 Challenger Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
1498cc
1998 cc
/
200 km/h
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1287
/
17 英寸
/
4398
4760
1790
1930
1590
1927
2610
2750
196
224
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
Fuel Economy
40
75 L
/
12.1
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Standard
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
9
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
225/50 R18
265/65 R17
225/50 R18
265/65 R17
✓
/
Key Spec
1.8 L - 1500 L
2.0 L
119 - 140 BHP
224 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
1.5L i-VTEC
/
4
4
10.6:1
/
DOHC IN VTC+IN-VTEC
/
119
224 BHP
87.7
/
6600
/
145
387 Nm
4300
/
i-VTEC
/
PGM-FI 电喷
/
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
HR-V SPORT
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Front and Rear Crumple Zone
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Blind Spot Warning
- Seatbelt pretensioner
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Tank 300 Challenger
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose HR-V SPORT if you care more about price; choose Tank 300 Challenger if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, HR-V SPORT has a fuel consumption of 5.35, while Tank 300 Challenger has a fuel consumption of 8.26. Therefore, HR-V SPORT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, HR-V SPORT has a wheelbase of 2610, while Tank 300 Challenger has a wheelbase of 2750. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tank 300 Challenger, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. HR-V SPORT uses Front Drive, while Tank 300 Challenger uses Four Wheel Drive.