iX3 M Sport vs Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
197 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4734 mm
5110 mm
1891 mm
1925 mm
1668 mm
1847 mm
2864 mm
3043 mm
/
487 L
Fuel Economy
/
9.5 Km/L
/
93 L
/
9.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
286 BHP
290 BHP - 475 BHP
TBD
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5 Seater
7 Seater
/
3.6 L - 6.4 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
286 BHP
290 BHP
400 Nm
353 Nm
/
3.6 L
Technologies
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
iX3 M Sport
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDurango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose iX3 M Sport if you care more about overall equipment; choose Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, iX3 M Sport has a fuel consumption of No data, while Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, iX3 M Sport has a wheelbase of 2864 mm, while Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) has a wheelbase of 3043 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. iX3 M Sport uses Front Wheel Drive, while Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) uses Rear Wheel Drive.