iX3 M Sport vs Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
8 Seater
4734 mm
5636 mm
1891 mm
2029 mm
1668 mm
1941 mm
2864 mm
3343 mm
/
5 Doors
/
592 L
Fuel Economy
/
8.1 Km/L
/
107 L
/
8.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
286 BHP
300 BHP - 440
TBD
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5 Seater
6 Seater - 8
/
3.5 L - 5.4 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
286 BHP
400 BHP
400 Nm
650 Nm
/
3.5 L
Technologies
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
iX3 M Sport
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Related comparisons
Editor's PickiX3 M Sport
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose iX3 M Sport if you care more about price; choose Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, iX3 M Sport has a fuel consumption of No data, while Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth has a fuel consumption of 12.35. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, iX3 M Sport has a wheelbase of 2864 mm, while Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth has a wheelbase of 3343 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. iX3 M Sport uses Front Wheel Drive, while Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth uses All Wheel Drive.