Jolion Pro Medium vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17"
/
4450
4341 mm
1841
1804 mm
1625
1693 mm
/
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
14
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
10.25"
/
✓
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
7 DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
147 - 148
105 BHP - 135 BHP
7 DCT & 7DCT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
147 HP
115 BHP
/
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
(STD, ECO, Sport, Snow)
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Jolion Pro Medium
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Jolion Pro Medium if you care more about power; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Jolion Pro Medium has a fuel consumption of 7.14, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Jolion Pro Medium has a wheelbase of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Jolion Pro Medium uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.