Jolion Pro Medium vs GS3 1.3T GB Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17"
/
4450
4350 mm
1841
1825 mm
1625
1680 mm
/
2560 mm
/
370 L
Fuel Economy
14
13.3 Km/L
/
50 L
/
13.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25"
/
✓
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
7 DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
147 - 148
172 BHP - 202 BHP
7 DCT & 7DCT
7DCT & Automatic & DCT
Gasoline
Petrol & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5L
1.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
147 HP
202 BHP
/
137 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
(STD, ECO, Sport, Snow)
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Jolion Pro Medium
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
GS3 1.3T GB
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS3 1.3T GB
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Jolion Pro Medium if you care more about fuel economy; choose GS3 1.3T GB if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Jolion Pro Medium has a fuel consumption of 7.14, while GS3 1.3T GB has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, Jolion Pro Medium is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Jolion Pro Medium has a wheelbase of No data, while GS3 1.3T GB has a wheelbase of 2560 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Jolion Pro Medium uses No data, while GS3 1.3T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.