Jolion Pro Premium 2025 vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
/
4490 mm
/
1874 mm
/
1613 mm
/
2750 mm
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
6
/
Transmission
7DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/55 R18
/
225/55 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
/
147 - 148
153 BHP - 305 BHP
7 DCT & 7DCT
TBD
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
148
153 BHP
/
340 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Jolion Pro Premium 2025
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Jolion Pro Premium 2025 if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Jolion Pro Premium 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Jolion Pro Premium 2025 has a wheelbase of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Jolion Pro Premium 2025 uses No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.