Kia Sportage GT Line vs Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
/
206 km/h
/
4
/
1984 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
/
5 Seater
/
5 Doors
/
4485 mm
/
1856 mm
/
1585 mm
/
2680 mm
/
530 L
/
170 m
Fuel Economy
/
11 Km/L
/
60 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.4 L
1.4 L - 2.0 L
130 BHP - 181 BHP
150 BHP - 180 BHP
7-SPEED DCT & Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
In-Line
/
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
180 BHP
/
320 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kia Sportage GT Line
Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickKia Sportage GT Line
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kia Sportage GT Line if you care more about price; choose Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kia Sportage GT Line has a fuel consumption of No data, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kia Sportage GT Line has a wheelbase of No data, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kia Sportage GT Line uses No data, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD uses Front Wheel Drive.