L200 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) vs DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD LS (M/T) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
169 km/h
170 km/h
Dimensions
3 Seater
5 Seater
5300 mm
5285 mm
1815 mm
1870 mm
1780 mm
1785 mm
3000 mm
3125 mm
/
options.1,100 L
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
12.5 Km/L
75 L
72 L
10 Km/L
12.5 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L - 2.5 L
1.9 L - 3.0 L
128 - 150
79 BHP - 190 BHP
5M/T & 6A/T & 6M/T & Manual
Automatic & Manual
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel
TBD
TBD
2 - 6 Seater
3 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
2.4 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
128 BHP
190 BHP
202 Nm
450 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
L200 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD)
- ABS
DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD LS (M/T)
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickL200 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose L200 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) if you care more about price; choose DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD LS (M/T) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, L200 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 10, while DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD LS (M/T) has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD LS (M/T) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, L200 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) has a wheelbase of 3000 mm, while DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD LS (M/T) has a wheelbase of 3125 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD LS (M/T), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. L200 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD LS (M/T) uses Four Wheel Drive.