CarteaCompare CarsLand Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

6

4

3956 cc

/

Japanese

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

3 Doors

5 Doors

4235 mm

4950 mm

1840 mm

1930 mm

1910 mm

1730 mm

2310 mm

2850 mm

700 L

/

290 m

/

Fuel Economy

8 Km/L

20 Km/L

90 L

65 L

8 Km/L

20 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

Interior

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

4

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

4.0 L - 4.0 L

2.5 L - 2.5 L

228 BHP - 228 BHP

240 BHP - 240 BHP

6 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 6-Speed Automatic & Automatic

Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Petrol & Gasoline

Hybrid & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 5 Seater

7 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

LED with Halogen

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

In-Line

4.0 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

4

4

228 BHP

240 BHP

360 Nm

237 Nm

/

None

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

    • Rear Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Stable driving comfort
  • Spacious interior design
  • Advanced safety systems

Negative

  • Moderate engine performance
  • Relatively high price
  • Limitations in storage space

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHighlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) if you care more about overall equipment; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

VS

Exeed | RX Flagship 2.0T

Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

VS

GAC | GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD)

Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

VS

GAC | GS8 2.0T GX (4WD)

Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

VS

Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

VS

Toyota | Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) has a wheelbase of 2310 mm, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door) uses Four Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.