CarteaCompare CarsLand Cruiser GXR1 vs Tiggo 9

Land Cruiser GXR1 vs Tiggo 9 Comparison

Car Information

/

192

/

390

/

4820 ×1930 × 1699

/

8.5

/

2.0

Engine / Motor

6

/

Dimensions

7

7

18

16英寸

5115

4820

1980

1930

1905

1699

/

2820

Fuel Economy

10.1

/

110

/

Comfort

/

/

/

Front Doors

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Driver Seat

/

7

/

/

Passenger Door

/

Hi Fabric

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Front + Knee + Side + Curtain

10

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

15.6

6

4

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Central And Rear

/

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

265/65 R18

245/50 R20

265/65 R18

245/50 R20

/

Key Spec

3.3 L - 5.7 L

-

240 BHP - 409

254 - 254

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

AT & Automatic

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7 - 8 Seater

7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.5

2.0

Gasoline

Gasoline

409

254

650

390

/

Turbocharge

/

192

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Land Cruiser GXR1

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Cool Box
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
  • Tiggo 9

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Power Tailgate
    • Electric Locks
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTiggo 9

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Land Cruiser GXR1 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Tiggo 9 if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Land Cruiser GXR1

VS

Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

Toyota | Land Cruiser GXR1

VS

Jeep | Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

Toyota | Land Cruiser GXR1

VS

Toyota | Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T

Toyota | Land Cruiser GXR1

VS

Toyota | Prado Adventure Mono Tone 2.4T

Toyota | Land Cruiser GXR1

VS

Hyundai | Tucson Premium+ 2.5L

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser GXR1 has a fuel consumption of 9.9, while Tiggo 9 has a fuel consumption of 8.5. Therefore, Tiggo 9 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser GXR1 has a wheelbase of No data, while Tiggo 9 has a wheelbase of 2820. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser GXR1 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 uses Four-Wheel Drive.