Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT vs Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
/
210
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
16
/
4345
5075
1870
1969
1930
1716
2310
2930
/
407
Fuel Economy
8.0
11.9
90
74
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver And Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
6.7
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
Drum
/
265/70R16
/
265/70R16
/
/
✓
Key Spec
-
2.5 L - 2500 L
201 - 228
226 BHP - 273 BHP
5 Speed Manual Transmission & 6 Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.0
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
228
226 BHP
360
420
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.4. Therefore, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT has a wheelbase of 2310, while Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser Hardtop DX Gas - 3 Doors 4x4 AT uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.