LiteAce VAN Gasoline AT vs Hiace Van STD GAS MT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
Dimensions
2
3
1240
2155
14
16
4045
5265
1665
1950
1930
1990
2650
3210
2000
3200
4.9m
5.5m
2075 - 1495 - 1305
2530 - 1760 - 1340
3.4m³
6.2m³
760
1045
Fuel Economy
14.1 Km/L
9.1 Km/L
43
70
Comfort
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
4.2
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
Driver & Front Passenger
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
2
2
Transmission
4-Speed Automatic Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Drive
Macpherson
Macpherson Strut
Coil Spring
Leaf spring rigid
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
Drum
Drum
165R14C
215/70R16C
165R14C
215/70R16C
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
2.5 L - 3.5 L
96 BHP - 96 BHP
88 BHP - 277
4-Speed Automatic & 4-Speed Automatic Transmission & 5-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual
6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual
Petrol & Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 2 Seater
3 - 13 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
3.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
96.5
277
134
351
Technologies
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
LiteAce VAN Gasoline AT
- Parking sensor rear
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
Hiace Van STD GAS MT
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- Remote Central Door Locking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose LiteAce VAN Gasoline AT if you care more about price; choose Hiace Van STD GAS MT if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, LiteAce VAN Gasoline AT has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while Hiace Van STD GAS MT has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, LiteAce VAN Gasoline AT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, LiteAce VAN Gasoline AT has a wheelbase of 2650, while Hiace Van STD GAS MT has a wheelbase of 3210. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hiace Van STD GAS MT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. LiteAce VAN Gasoline AT uses Rear Drive, while Hiace Van STD GAS MT uses Rear Drive.