CarteaCompare CarsLiteAce VAN Gasoline MT vs Hiace 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater)

LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT vs Hiace 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

/

/

160 km/h

Dimensions

2

3 Seater

1230

/

14

/

4045

5265 mm

1665

1950 mm

1930

1990 mm

2650

3210 mm

2000

/

4.9m

/

2075 - 1495 - 1305

/

3.4m³

/

770

/

Fuel Economy

14.1 Km/L

9.9 Km/L

43

65 L

/

9.9 Km/L

Comfort

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

/

Infotainment

7

/

/

/

2

/

Transmission

5-Speed Manual Transmission

Manual

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Coil Spring

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Drum

/

165R14C

/

165R14C

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

2.5 L - 3.5 L

96 BHP - 96 BHP

88 BHP - 277

4-Speed Automatic & 4-Speed Automatic Transmission & 5-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

Petrol & Gasoline

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

2 Seater - 2 Seater

3 - 13 Seater

Exterior

/

Engine

1.5

3.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

96.5

277 BHP

134

360 Nm

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
  • Hiace 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater)

    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT if you care more about price; choose Hiace 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot Partner 2022 1.6L Long (Petrol)

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot Partner 2023 1.6L Long (Diesel)

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Peugeot | Partner 1.6L Long (Petrol)

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Renault | Express Van(Diesel)

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot Partner 2021 1.6L K9 (Long)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT has a fuel consumption of 7.09, while Hiace 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater) has a fuel consumption of 10.1. Therefore, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT has a wheelbase of 2650, while Hiace 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater) has a wheelbase of 3210 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hiace 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT uses Rear Drive, while Hiace 3.5L GL STD Roof Panel Van (3-Seater) uses Rear Wheel Drive.