CarteaCompare CarsLX600 F Sport 3.5L vs XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater)

LX600 F Sport 3.5L vs XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

220 km/h

180 km/h

6

/

3489 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

7 Seater

7 Seater

5 Doors

/

5100 mm

4953 mm

1990 mm

2140 mm

1895 mm

1775 mm

2850 mm

2985 mm

174 L

314 L

205 m

/

Fuel Economy

8 Km/L

13.5 Km/L

110 L

71 L

8 Km/L

13.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

25

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.5 L - 5.7 L

2.0 L

275 hp - 457 BHP

249 BHP - 300 BHP

10 Speed Automatic Transmission & 10-Speed Automatic & automatic

TBD

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7 Seater - 8

7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

409 BHP

300 BHP

650 Nm

420 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • LX600 F Sport 3.5L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater)

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickXC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose LX600 F Sport 3.5L if you care more about power; choose XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lexus | LX600 F Sport 3.5L

VS

Volvo | XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater)

Lexus | LX600 F Sport 3.5L

VS

Land Rover | Vogue (P550e)

Lexus | LX600 F Sport 3.5L

VS

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE Coupé

Lexus | LX600 F Sport 3.5L

VS

BMW | X5M Competition 4.4T xDrive

Lexus | LX600 F Sport 3.5L

VS

Lexus | Lexus LX600 F Sport 3.5L

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, LX600 F Sport 3.5L has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, LX600 F Sport 3.5L has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) has a wheelbase of 2985 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. LX600 F Sport 3.5L uses All Wheel Drive, while XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) uses All Wheel Drive.