CarteaCompare CarsLynk&Co 09 Halo vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Lynk&Co 09 Halo vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

5042*1977*1780

/

Engine / Motor

215

/

/

4

/

GCC

Dimensions

7

7 Seater

2120

/

20"

/

5042

4950 mm

1977

1930 mm

1780

1730 mm

2984

2850 mm

221

/

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

12.6

20 Km/L

/

65 L

/

20 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

14.6"

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

12.3"

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Nappa

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

14

/

Bose Audio

/

Transmission

8AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

AWD

/

SLA Suspension

/

Multi Link

/

EPAS

/

Wheels/brakes

275/45 R20

/

275/45 R20

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.5 L - 2.5 L

254 - 254

240 BHP - 240 BHP

8AT & Automatic

Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Gasoline & Hybrid

Hybrid & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7

7 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

كهربائي

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

2.5 L

Hybrid

Hybrid

254

240 BHP

5500

/

350

237 Nm

4800

/

/

In-Line

/

None

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Eco/Sports/Comfort/Off-road/Individual

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Lynk&Co 09 Halo

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Rollover stability control
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Seatbelt pretensioner
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

    • Rear Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Stable driving comfort
  • Spacious interior design
  • Advanced safety systems

Negative

  • Moderate engine performance
  • Relatively high price
  • Limitations in storage space

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLynk&Co 09 Halo

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Lynk&Co 09 Halo if you care more about price; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 09 Halo

VS

Exeed | RX Flagship 2.0T

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 09 Halo

VS

GAC | GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD)

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 09 Halo

VS

GAC | GS8 2.0T GX (4WD)

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 09 Halo

VS

Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (3 Door)

Lynk & Co | Lynk&Co 09 Halo

VS

Toyota | Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 09 Halo has a fuel consumption of 7.94, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 09 Halo has a wheelbase of 2984, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk&Co 09 Halo, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 09 Halo uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.