M4 Passenger vs Alphard Executive Lounge Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160
180 km/h
/
6
/
3456 cc
/
Japanese
Dimensions
Sliding Door
/
9
7 Seater
2020
/
16
/
5200
5005 mm
1890
1850 mm
1980
1945 mm
3080
3000 mm
160
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
80
85 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
6
12
/
14
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
5
/
5MT
/
Chassis & Steering
Dual Swing Arm Independent
/
Dependent steel leaf spring suspension
/
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/65 R16
/
215/65 R16
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
3.5 L
145 BHP
266 BHP - 296 BHP
5MT
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
2 - 9
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
2.0L VVT
/
145 BHP
296 BHP
185
391 Nm
/
V
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
M4 Passenger
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
Alphard Executive Lounge
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose M4 Passenger if you care more about price; choose Alphard Executive Lounge if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, M4 Passenger has a fuel consumption of No data, while Alphard Executive Lounge has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, M4 Passenger has a wheelbase of 3080, while Alphard Executive Lounge has a wheelbase of 3000 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, M4 Passenger, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. M4 Passenger uses No data, while Alphard Executive Lounge uses Front Wheel Drive.