Mage E2 vs Mage E1 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
190
4
4
Dimensions
5
5
1480
1480
20"
19
4650
4650
1905
1905
1630
1630
2775
2775
Fuel Economy
15.8
15.8
51
51
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
13.2"
10.25
✓
/
10.25"
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
6
4
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
13.2
13.2
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
6
Transmission
7AT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
MacPherson Independent Suspension
/
Multi-Link Independent Suspension
/
EPS
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated
/
Disc
/
235/50R20
235/55 R19
235/50R20
235/55 R19
Key Spec
1.5
1.5
202 BHP
202 BHP
7AT & AT
7AT & AT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Engine
1.5
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
202 BHP
202 BHP
5200
/
305
305
4000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport / Comfrot
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mage E2
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Rollover stability control
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Mage E1
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMage E1
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mage E2 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mage E1 if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mage E2 has a fuel consumption of 6.33, while Mage E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.33. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mage E2 has a wheelbase of 2775, while Mage E1 has a wheelbase of 2775. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mage E2 uses Front Drive, while Mage E1 uses Front Drive.