Max RS vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
20"
/
4785
4490 mm
1930
1874 mm
1625
1613 mm
2880
2750 mm
Fuel Economy
56
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Front and Back Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
/
Transmission
single-speed AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
double wishbone suspension
/
multi-link suspension
/
Key Spec
1.5L
/
496 hp
153 BHP - 305 BHP
AT & single-speed AT
TBD
Electric & Hybrid
Electric
TBD
/
5
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5L
/
Hybrid
Electric
Turbocharge
/
496 hp
153 BHP
365
/
675
340 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Max RS
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Max RS if you care more about interior space; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Max RS , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.