Max RS vs Hino 300 Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
3
20"
/
4785
4,765
1930
1,880
1625
2,200
2880
3,430
Fuel Economy
56
/
/
6.6 km/L
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
/
Transmission
single-speed AT
6-speed Manual transmission
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
/
double wishbone suspension
/
multi-link suspension
/
Key Spec
1.5L
4.0 L
496 hp
147
AT & single-speed AT
6-speed Manual transmission
Electric & Hybrid
Diesel
TBD
TBD
5
3
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5L
4.0 L
Hybrid
Diesel
Turbocharge
/
496 hp
147
365
/
675
420
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Max RS
Hino 300
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHino 300
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Max RS if you care more about power; choose Hino 300 if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data, while Hino 300 has a fuel consumption of 15.15. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880, while Hino 300 has a wheelbase of 3,430. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hino 300, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Hino 300 uses No data.