Max RS vs iCAUR V27 Classic Comparison

Car Information

4.3

8.5

365

/

40

300

175km WLTP

/

/

Electric

/

1.8

/

95

Dimensions

5

5

20"

19"

4785

5045

1930

1976

1625

1894

2880

2900

/

/

Fuel Economy

56

/

/

55

Interior

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

10.2

15.4"

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

8.88"

/

Dual

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

15.6

/

/

/

/

19

/

/

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

0.5

Transmission

single-speed AT

AT

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Rear Drive

double wishbone suspension

MacPherson

multi-link suspension

Multi Link

Wheels/brakes

/

255/55 R19

/

255/55 R19

Key Spec

1.5L

/

496 hp

248 - 450

AT & single-speed AT

AT

Electric & Hybrid

Electric

TBD

/

5

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5L

1.5

Hybrid

Electric

Turbocharge

/

496 hp

248

365

/

675

300

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Snow, Sand, Etc

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

185

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Max RS

    • iCAUR V27 Classic

      • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Number of Airbags
      • Driving Recorder
      • Rollover stability control
      • Collision Detection
      • Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
      • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickMax RS

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Max RS if you care more about price; choose iCAUR V27 Classic if you care more about interior space.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    AITO | Max RS

    VS

    Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

    AITO | Max RS

    VS

    Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

    AITO | Max RS

    VS

    Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

    AITO | Max RS

    VS

    Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

    AITO | Max RS

    VS

    Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data, while iCAUR V27 Classic has a fuel consumption of 1.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880, while iCAUR V27 Classic has a wheelbase of 2900. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, iCAUR V27 Classic, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive, while iCAUR V27 Classic uses Rear Drive.