Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus vs TXL Comfort 1.6T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
200 km/h
6
4
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5100
4780 mm
1994
1885 mm
1756
1730 mm
3010
2800 mm
566
450 L
/
5 Doors
/
200 m
Fuel Economy
9.1
16 Km/L
/
50 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
284 BHP - 345 BHP
197 BHP - 290 BHP
8-speed Automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
345 BHP
290 BHP
500
400 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
TXL Comfort 1.6T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus if you care more about interior space; choose TXL Comfort 1.6T if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a fuel consumption of 10.99, while TXL Comfort 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, TXL Comfort 1.6T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a wheelbase of 3010, while TXL Comfort 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus uses All Wheel Drive, while TXL Comfort 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive.