Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison

Car Information

8.3

/

598 km

/

800V

Engine / Motor

190

/

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

/

4.275

/

1.765

/

1.535

/

2.570

/

240

514

/

64

Fuel Economy

15.4

/

48

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

11.9

/

Dinamica Microfibre

/

/

Sport Seats Plus

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

14.5

Battery/Charging

/

270

/

11

/

10 min

Transmission

Automatic

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

/

145 BHP - 148 BHP

TBD

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

/

Petrol

Electric

148 BHP

/

192

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

Lithium-ion

/

489

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about price; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

VS

Haval | Haval Jolion Basic

Mazda | Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

VS

GAC | GS3 1.3T GB

Mazda | Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

VS

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 SV

Mazda | Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Enjoy

Mazda | Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2019 1.6L Active

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.