Mazda CX9 2024 2.5T S (AWD) vs Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL Comparison
Car Information
✓
✓
/
7.5
Engine / Motor
N/A
N/A
/
185
Dimensions
7 Seater
8 Seater
5.075
5.233
1.969
2.024
1.716
1.960
2.930
3.022
/
528
/
✓
Fuel Economy
74
106
/
9.1
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
3.5 L - 5.4 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
300 BHP - 440
Automatic
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
6 Seater - 8
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
3.5 L
Petrol
Petrol
226 BHP
385 BHP
420
629
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX9 2024 2.5T S (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Reflectors
- Tire Repair Kit
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX9 2024 2.5T S (AWD) if you care more about price; choose Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX9 2024 2.5T S (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX9 2024 2.5T S (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.930, while Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL has a wheelbase of 3.022. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX9 2024 2.5T S (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL uses All Wheel Drive.