Mazda CX90 2024 3.3L High Plus vs PATROL SE Titanium Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
6
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
8 Seater
5.100
5350
1.994
2030
1.756
1945
3.010
3075
566
/
/
18
/
244
Fuel Economy
9.1
/
/
97
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
14.3
/
✓
/
Monolith Display
/
Driver Seat
/
Premium Leatherette
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front+Side+Curtain+Driver Knee
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
12
/
12.8
/
14.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
KLIPSCH
Transmission
Automatic
9 SPEED AUTOMATIC
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
/
/
Electric Power Steering
Wheels/brakes
/
Disc
/
Disc
/
265/70 R18
/
265/70 R18
Key Spec
3.3 L - 3.3 L
3.5 L - 425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)
340 HP - 345 BHP
275 BHP - 495 BHP
8 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH Mi-DRIVE & Automatic
9 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 9-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6 - 8
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
3.8 L
Petrol
Gasoline
345 BHP
316 BHP
500
386
/
TYPE 3.8-LITER DOHC, V6, CVTCS DIG ENGINE
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
ROCK, SAND, ECO, MUD, STANDARD, SPORT
/
✓
/
Auto
/
✓
/
L1
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX90 2024 3.3L High Plus
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
PATROL SE Titanium
- Power Tailgate
- Cool Box
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Outstanding off-road performance
- Outstanding engine power
- Spacious and luxurious interior design
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Slow electronic system response
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX90 2024 3.3L High Plus if you care more about price; choose PATROL SE Titanium if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a fuel consumption of 10.99, while PATROL SE Titanium has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a wheelbase of 3.010, while PATROL SE Titanium has a wheelbase of 3075. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, PATROL SE Titanium, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX90 2024 3.3L High Plus uses All Wheel Drive, while PATROL SE Titanium uses No data.