Megane 1.6L SE vs Elantra 1.6L Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
209 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4632 mm
4675 mm
1814 mm
1825 mm
1443 mm
1430 mm
2711 mm
2720 mm
503 L
474 L
Fuel Economy
15.2 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
50 L
50 L
15.2 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
105 BHP - 143 BHP
103 - 159 BHP
Auto (CVT) & Automatic & Manual
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
115 BHP
127 BHP
156 Nm
157 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Megane 1.6L SE
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Elantra 1.6L Comfort
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Advanced security equipment
Negative
- There is little space in the rear seats
- Sound insulation while driving is poor
- Average engine performance
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMegane 1.6L SE
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Megane 1.6L SE if you care more about price; choose Elantra 1.6L Comfort if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Megane 1.6L SE has a fuel consumption of 6.58, while Elantra 1.6L Comfort has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, Megane 1.6L SE is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Megane 1.6L SE has a wheelbase of 2711 mm, while Elantra 1.6L Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Elantra 1.6L Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Megane 1.6L SE uses Front Wheel Drive, while Elantra 1.6L Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.