Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ vs iX xDrive40 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
200 km/h
6
/
2999 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4924 mm
4953 mm
1948 mm
1967 mm
1796 mm
1695 mm
2995 mm
3000 mm
655 L
500 L
198 m
/
Fuel Economy
11
/
85 L
/
9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 4.0 L
/
367 BHP - 625 hp
326 BHP - 619 BHP
9-speed automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
Single Turbo
/
4
/
429 BHP
326 BHP
320
/
560 Nm
630 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+
- Remote key types
iX xDrive40
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickiX xDrive40
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ if you care more about power; choose iX xDrive40 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while iX xDrive40 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2995 mm, while iX xDrive40 has a wheelbase of 3000 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, iX xDrive40, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while iX xDrive40 uses All Wheel Drive.