Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ vs Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
275
6
/
2999 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
/
4924 mm
4,716
1948 mm
1,890
1796 mm
1,648
2995 mm
2,888
655 L
/
198 m
/
/
2,310
Fuel Economy
11
13.3
85 L
65
9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Burmester®
Transmission
9-speed automatic
9-speed automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 4.0 L
2.0L
367 BHP - 625 hp
416 - 671
9-speed automatic
9-speed automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
3.0 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Single Turbo
✓
4
/
429 BHP
671
320
500
560 Nm
1,020
/
2.0 L turbocharged inline-4 + rear electric motor
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+
- Remote key types
Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ if you care more about interior space; choose Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2995 mm, while Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a wheelbase of 2,888. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE uses Four-Wheel Drive.