Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ vs GLS 600 Maybach Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
250 km/h
/
8
/
3982 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
2,700
/
5,207
5207 mm
1,956
2030 mm
1,823
1850 mm
3,135
3135 mm
/
5 Doors
/
493 L
/
200 m
Fuel Economy
10
8 Km/L
90
90 L
/
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.0L
3.0 L - 4.7 L
612
375 BHP - 550 BHP
9-speed automatic
9-speed automatic & 9G-TRONIC 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7
5 - 7
Engine
V
V
4.0L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
/
/
twin-turbo
Twin Turbo
612
550 BHP
450
/
850
730 Nm
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+
- 360 Degree Camera
- Blind Spot Warning
GLS 600 Maybach
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ if you care more about price; choose GLS 600 Maybach if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 10, while GLS 600 Maybach has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3,135, while GLS 600 Maybach has a wheelbase of 3135 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ uses Four-Wheel Drive, while GLS 600 Maybach uses All Wheel Drive.