Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ vs Urus S 4.0T V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
305 km/h
/
8
/
3996 cc
Dimensions
7
4 Seater
2,700
/
5,207
5123 mm
1,956
2022 mm
1,823
1638 mm
3,135
3003 mm
/
5 Doors
/
617 L
/
172 m
Fuel Economy
10
7 Km/L
90
75 L
/
7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.0L
4.0 L
612
650 BHP - 800 BHP
9-speed automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7
4 Seater
Engine
V
V
4.0L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
/
/
twin-turbo
Twin Turbo
612
666 BHP
450
/
850
850 Nm
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+
- 360 Degree Camera
- Blind Spot Warning
Urus S 4.0T V8
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Outstanding sports performance with a powerful engine.
- Unique and eye catching exterior design.
- A luxurious interior with advanced technological equipment.
Negative
- The cost of purchase and maintenance is high.
- High fuel consumption and poor environmental considerations.
- Limited comfort while driving long distances.
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ if you care more about price; choose Urus S 4.0T V8 if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 10, while Urus S 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3,135, while Urus S 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 3003 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Urus S 4.0T V8 uses All Wheel Drive.