MG ZS 2023 1.5L LUX vs Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
10.9
/
Engine / Motor
170
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4314
4200
1809
1760
1624
1570
2585
2555
448
341
/
Flush Door
/
16
/
5
Fuel Economy
17.2
/
48
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Cloth
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
112 BHP - 168
109 BHP - 113
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
112 BHP
111 BHP
150
/
/
1.5L
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
MG ZS 2023 1.5L LUX
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 2 Pro Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MG ZS 2023 1.5L LUX if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MG ZS 2023 1.5L LUX has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MG ZS 2023 1.5L LUX has a wheelbase of 2585, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MG ZS 2023 1.5L LUX, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG ZS 2023 1.5L LUX uses Front Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive.